WHY THE WAR AGAINST WOMEN (WAW)
Is Going Balls To The Wall
(This is an excerpt from a book sold on Amazon called HOW TO BE A MAN IN THE WAR AGAINST WOMEN. You can read the whole book by going here on Amazon and choosing one of the free reading apps, or you can read it on your Kindle if you have one.)
(Neal Horsley, Christian Gallery News Service, Dec 18, 2011)
"Balls to the wall" describes a fighter pilot pushing the stick located between his legs--the ball--so far forward that it touches the control panel of the plane--the wall.
"Balls to the wall" is Chuck Yeager-speak for speed.
No one from the World War II generation understood speed better than Chuck Yeager. He was the test pilot who broke the sound barrier. While a fighter pilot in WWII, Yeager had eyes that would spot an enemy convoy minutes before the rest of the pilots flying in formation with him. He was Tom Wolfe's choice for the epitome of a man who had "The Right Stuff," and Chuck Yeager's character starred in both the book and the movie by that name. So saying that the War Against Women has gone "balls to the wall" is Yeager-speak that the War Against Women is moving toward maximum velocity.
This article demonstrates the fundamental weakness in the way this generation has been trained to relate to words.
People today simply stop reading when they think they see a false statement. Since the vast majority of people are totally oblivious to the War Against Women, most people will refuse to read this article because not only do they not see the war against women moving toward maximum velocity, they don't see the war against women at all.
Refusing to read this article does nothing to slow down the War Against Women. In fact it tends to move the WAW closer to maximum velocity.
THE MOST HORRIBLE STORY THAT CAN BE TOLD
The story of the War Against Women that is occurring around us today makes words a curse that must be born by our species. Truly it would be better that we not have to think the words that explain the truth about the War Against Women. Better because our peace of mind could exist then. But with the words that describe the War Against Women all peace of mind disappears across the earth and all that is left to our species is the horrible words that describe the War Against Women.
CONFLICTED SOLDIERS IN THE WAR AGAINST WOMEN
I loathe having to tell this story.
Even though the national news media has painted the writer of this story--me--as a terrorist in the War Against Women, it's just not that easy to prove I'm even a misogynist, much less a terrorist in the War Against Women.
During my lifetime more than a few women, in addition to my Mother, have given me access to the succor and comfort afforded and symbolized by their breasts. And I loved them all...the best way I knew how at the time.
But what makes it impossible to convict me of being a misogynist is my own daughter.
Today, as I write this article, my daughter is in the final days of waiting to deliver my granddaughter from her womb to the nation called the United States of America. As a father and grandfather my heart's desire is to protect my daughter. For me to contemplate my role in the War Against Women realizing that my own daughter and granddaughter are potential targets in this war is a source of such great conflict in me that writing this report is tantamount to breathing: impossible to avoid.
Furthermore, as a journalist with unique access to the conditions that have created the War Against Women , if I did not try to find words that explain this story, I would be a poor excuse for a journalist. This article proves I try to be a good journalist.
While you can ignore the War Against Women (WAW) today, the day will come when no one on earth can ignore it any longer. That's because, I repeat, the War Against Women is going balls to the wall, moving toward maximum velocity.
WHAT MAXIMUM VELOCITY LOOKS LIKE
Moving toward maximum velocity means that in 2011, even Santa Claus, instead of leaving presents, has started killing entire families.
WAW THE BEST KEPT SECRET IN THE USA
But aside from a passing notice by the press, notice that is quickly forgotten, society is ignoring--no, actively denies--the meaning of Santa's murderous actions.
Read on and you'll see news reports of men burning women alive, men opening fire on crowds of women, men slashing women for no reason other than to see their flesh open, men bombing women.
That's what war looks like. Even though the documentation in this article proves the War Against Women (WAW) is raging around us each day that passes, no one wants to CALL IT WAR. It's the best kept secret in the USA.
NOBODY wants to admit that war has been launched against women: we've been trained to think women and children should be exempt from war.
DENIAL OF THE WAR AGAINST WOMEN EXACERBATES THE WAR
Ignoring the war against women is denial's way to prevent continent wide tectonic plates of fear from crashing together creating constant, unremitting earthquakes of fear.
But denial does not work very well: the War Against Women has a way of bursting into the national psyche.
Authorities said they believed Benjamin Colton Barnes, 24 — who was found dead Monday, apparently of hypothermia, in Mount Rainier National Park — shot and killed Park Ranger Margaret Anderson, 34, on Sunday. He is also believed to have shot and wounded four people, two of them critically, earlier in the day at a New Year's party in Skyway, near Seattle, authorities said.
Barnes, a private first class, was discharged from the Army for misconduct in 2009 after he was charged with drunken driving and improperly transporting a privately owned weapon at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Wash. Lewis-McChord has drawn national attention for widespread problems with post-traumatic stress disorder among service members returning from Afghanistan and from Iraq, where Barnes served in 2007 and 2008
The base, near Tacoma about 50 miles south of Seattle, has seen numerous violent incidents, leading to several charges and convictions of soldiers for serious crimes. According to The Seattle Times, they include:
- Pfc. Dakota Wolf, 19, who is charged in the stabbing death Nov. 30 of a 19-year-old woman in a Seattle suburb while AWOL.
- Sgt. David Stewart, 38, who killed himself and his wife after leading authorities on a high-speed chase in April. Their 5-year-old son was found dead at home.
- Spc. Ivette Gonzalez Davis, 24, who was sentenced to life in prison in August 2010 for shooting two soldiers and kidnapping their baby.
- Sgt. Sheldon Plummer, who was sentenced to 14 years in prison for strangling his wife in February 2010.
Notice how every incident tracks back to a woman?
AM I A TERRORIST IN THE WAR AGAINST WOMEN?
It has been impossible for me to ignore the War Against Women because, as the picture below proves, for over a decade the Wall Street Journal and virtually every other national news organization in the nation has been painting me as a man who wanted women to die.
My personal exposure to the warfare raging in this nation made me a reporter with unique insight into the War Against Women. It is that insight I am attempting to bring to an audience today, whether people want to hear it or not.
AND I HAVE A GUARANTEED AUDIENCE
Any person writing about any aspect of war in our contemporary society is guaranteed to have an audience. Even if the audience consists only of the thousands of law enforcement personnel armed and authorized to arrest any person if they see one word, phrase, or idea that law enforcement believes can be used to prove the writer is involved in any way with terrorism against the United States of America, an audience is guaranteed.
That makes writing about the War Against Women (WAW) exactly like walking across a mine field where the writer has to examine very closely where the next step takes him unless he wants to be blown away.
THE WAR TAKES MANY FORMS: ALL OF THEM DEADLY
RADFORD, Va. (AP) — The man authorities say killed a Virginia Tech police officer on Dec. 8, 2011 before committing suicide had broken up with his girlfriend over the summer and vaguely mentioned some family issues, but he was loyal and never hinted at plans for violence, friends and former classmates said Saturday.
"Recent Breakup, Drugs May Have Led to Gunman's Rampage
More details are emerging about Tyler Brehm, the gunman who opened fired on drivers in Hollywood on Friday morning injuring at least two men....Brehm’s ex-girlfriend, Alicia Alligood, came forward on Saturday. She and Hollywood resident, Brehm, had broken up earlier this month after dating for four years, she tells KTLA. She says that may have triggered the rampage."
THE WAR AGAINST WOMEN IS REVOLT
By understanding the activity called revolt we understand much that is otherwise inexplicable in the WAW.
Revolt, as explained by Jacques Elull, "breaks out, man becomes a rebel, a community revolts when an act, a situation, or a relationship becomes intolerable. It was possible to endure injustice, want, hunger, oppression, and scorn up to a certain point, up to a certain moment; then, suddenly, sometimes as a result of a seemingly insignificant occurrence--no more significant, at any rate, than any number of others--the rebel says NO," Ellul concluded.
A massive revolt is going on in this world today. I call this revolt the War Against Women (WAW). And truly it is going balls to the wall.
This is only one of a daily tsunami of headlines about deadly attacks against women from all across the world:
Family 'honor killing' trial in Canada sparks debate over culture clash
EXPLORE THE WAR ZONE
There is no doubt that violence against women has reached warfare proportions and even with women's rights groups screaming bloody murder as loud as they can, America ignores the War Against Women (WAW) as it moves toward maximum velocity.
The National Organization of Women, whose National Presidentress, Kim Gandy, I once fought in Court for over five years until she beat me down like her own private bitch, tells us, "Despite the fact that advocacy groups like NOW have worked for two decades to halt the epidemic of gender-based violence and sexual assault, the numbers are still shocking."Statistics Taken From NOW Web site http://www.now.org/issues/violence/stats.html):
In 2005, 1,181 women were murdered by an intimate partner. That's an average of three women every day. Of all the women murdered in the U.S., about one-third were killed by an intimate partner.
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE (Intimate Partner Violence or Battering)
Domestic violence can be defined as a pattern of abusive behavior in any relationship that is used by one partner to gain or maintain power and control over an intimate partner. According to the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, women experience about 4.8 million intimate partner-related physical assaults and rapes every year. Less than 20 percent of battered women sought medical treatment following an injury.
According to the National Crime Victimization Survey, which includes crimes that were not reported to the police, 232,960 women in the U.S. were raped or sexually assaulted in 2006. That's more than 600 women every day. Other estimates, such as those generated by the FBI, are much lower because they rely on data from law enforcement agencies. A significant number of crimes are never even reported for reasons that include the victim's feeling that nothing can/will be done and the personal nature of the incident.
VIOLENCE BETWEEN SAME-SEX COUPLES
According to the National Coalition of Anti-Violence Programs, "domestic violence affecting LGBT individuals continues to be grossly underreported . . . there is a lack of awareness and denial about the existence of this type of violence and its impact, both by LGBT people and non-LGBT people alike."
Myths regarding gender roles perpetuate the silence surrounding these abusive relationships; for example, the belief that there aren't abusive lesbian relationships because women don't abuse each other. Shelters are often unequipped to handle the needs of lesbians (as a women-only shelter isn't much defense against a female abuser), and transgendered individuals. Statistics regarding domestic violence against LGBT people are unavailable at the national level, but as regional studies demonstrate, domestic violence is as much as a problem within LGBT communities as it is among heterosexual ones.
Young women, low-income women and some minorities are disproportionately victims of domestic violence and rape. Women ages 20-24 are at greatest risk of nonfatal domestic violence, and women age 24 and under suffer from the highest rates of rape. The Justice Department estimates that one in five women will experience rape or attempted rape during their college years, and that less than five percent of these rapes will be reported. Income is also a factor: the poorer the household, the higher the rate of domestic violence -- with women in the lowest income category experiencing more than six times the rate of nonfatal intimate partner violence as compared to women in the highest income category. When we consider race, we see that African-American women face higher rates of domestic violence than white women, and American-Indian women are victimized at a rate more than double that of women of other races.
STATISTICS DO NOT REVEAL THE TRUTH
As always, statistics are useless in generating the kind of personal human response such facts would create if we could feel the terror, the pain, the massive confusion that came in the midst of the real events the statistics display, useless like the picture of icebergs in Antarctica seen from a TV screen are useless in helping the viewer feel the Antarctic cold. Maybe it's impossible for a viewer to feel the truth a woman feels when she realizes that she has been turned into a slave at best, or she realizes that her life is being aborted at worst.
WOMEN BOUGHT AS SLAVES
The Times of India article on Sep 4, 2005 is headlined, "One minor girl, many Arabs."
It states, "They are old predators with new vigour. Often bearded, invariably in flowing robes and expensive turbans. The rich, middle-aged Arabs increasingly stalk the deprived streets of Hyderabad like medieval monarchs would stalk their harems in days that we wrongly think are history. These Viagra enabled Arabs are perpetrating a blatant crime under the veneer of nikaah, the Islamic rules of marriage. Misusing the sanctioned provision which allows a Muslim man to have four wives at a time, many old Arabs are not just marrying minors in Hyderabad, but marrying more than one minor in a single sitting...'The Arabs prefer teenage, virgin brides,' says Jameela Nishat, who counsels and sensitises young women against the malaise.'"
The point is obvious. The young women and/or their families have to be taught not to sell themselves as slaves to Arab men.
Women across the world have been taught to sell themselves into slavery and death. And they have been taught to do this by men who--like the Arabs seeking "virgin" brides--are using all the power and resources of this world to train women to be willing slaves and murderers instead of teaching women to nurture and protect the children of this world.
The War Against Women (WAW) is the result of women surrendering to the temptations of men like these.
ANECDOTES ABOUND DEMONSTRATING HOW THE WAR IS BEING CARRIED OUT
Flash on the images of women in burkhas and how that image is in the minds of people across the world as an integral image of the War on Terrorism.
The War on Terrorism and the image of women in burkas and veils is simply the latest opportunity for the mass media to use the role of women and the plight of women to justify massive military intervention and global political change--regime change, the powerful call it.
As recent events have proven, condition the world to see we're helping the women and we can justify blowing up half a nation.
Does that give you a hint at the massive social conditioning powers the mass media has given government and the men who control government since the Second World War? Further, does it show you that women are themselves being used as a part of the War on Terror.
It is this conjunction between the role of women and the War on Terror that is the key to understanding why the War on Women is raging around us.
At the anecdotal level it's easy to disparage any idea that there is a truly distinct War Against Women because most of the anecdotes are examples of men gone mad because of their rejection by a woman or women in general.
Take Jared Lougher for example.
He opened fire in a mall killing women and children (Okay, maybe there was a man in the line of fire, but the man was collateral damage) a female congressperson was the main target.
An official explanation for Jared Lougher's attack was never released to the public but a strong case can be made that Jared Lougher is a symbol for what happens to a man who is totally rejected by women. You've heard the waggish quip that the solution to all mens' problems is they need to get laid? Well, that might actually have been a way to delay Jared Lougher's explosion in the War Against Women. Because Jared Lougher obviously didn't get laid, found no breasts to succor him, found only homicidal rage.
Or Take this example:
The headline read, "Worst Mass Killing in Orange County History Rocks Quiet Coastal Community."
Scott Evans Dekraai invaded a beauty parlor in Orange County, California. All the national news outlets focused on two things: the shooter's instability--The Washington Post headline read, "Poor decisions, bad luck and soured relationships shadowed California salon shooting suspect"; and the community's shock--"The day after a lone gunman stormed a Seal Beach beauty salon and shot nine people - killing eight - friends, family and neighbors wandered around the scene of the worst mass killing in Orange County history in a state of profound grief and shock."
Orange County District Attorney Tony Rackauckas said. The prosecutor called Dekraai "a methodical and merciless killer."
"We believe that the defendant committed this unimaginable act of violence because he wanted to kill his ex-wife over a custody dispute concerning their 8-year-old son. He was willing to end any life in his path, and he did. Clearly this two-minute murder spree could not have been about loving his son," the prosecutor said.
And that's about as far as news reports go in trying to explain why such a horrible massacre occurred. The man was unstable and the community was shocked.
Can you see such reporting is not swimming very deep in the reporting pool. No reporter is so dense that they would be oblivious to the "why" question. In fact the "why" of the beauty parlor massacre and the meaning of its symbolic content is so obvious that news reporters and commentators must be being paid NOT to follow the story of the symbolic meaning of choosing Orange County, California and a Beauty Parlor in Orange County, California.
Only an official policy of silence explains why the symbolism of the Orange County Massacre is covered up, why some News Director does not assign her best reporter to the story.
Orange County, California has long been a symbol in the USA, a symbol of Republican affluent upper middle class America, a symbol of modern American conservatism: cautious but not old-fashioned, conservative but at the same time California au courant. From clothing styles, to hair styles, to Ronald Reagan, Orange County, California has long been intent on proving that what happens in California happens in the rest of the nation in a few short years. That's one reason the massacre in Orange County needs to be explained and explained quick. What happens in California does happen in the rest of the nation.
The details of the massacre are well reported. A messy divorce, a custody battle, an unstable husband struggling with a slew of physical and psychological problems. The husband, wearing body armor walks into the beauty salon and methodically unloads his weapon on everyone in sight, killing eight people and leaving one other critically wounded, then surrenders to face the consequences.
Why did the man choose the beauty parlor, why kill ALL the women?
The answer is obvious: the man wanted his rage to send not just a message about his own wife, but about women in general, about why he was enraged at ALL women.
Now that's the real War Between the Sexes being played out in the streets, cities, and nations of the modern world.
The War Against Women is easy for men like me to make light of.
"Serial butt slasher attacking women shoppers in Virginia stores, cops say"
Nothing symbolizes the War Against Women (WAW) in all its various permutations better than the following story reported by the Associated Press on July 27, 2011:
(CBS/AP) - Authorities say they are hunting for a serial butt slasher after a string of attacks on young women in shopping malls throughout Fairfax County, Virginia. According to police spokesperson Lucy Caldwell, the latest attack occurred at Fair Oaks mall around 5:30 p.m. Monday. Caldwell says the woman heard someone behind her drop clothes or a package. The woman then felt a sharp pain and realized she had been cut. Caldwell says the woman was cut on the buttocks through her denim shorts with a box cutter or razor."
"There have similar attacks in retail stores across the county in the last six months, Caldwell says. All of the victims have been in their late teens or early 20s. Ex-FBI profiler Gregg McCrary said the attacks likely won't stop until the culprit is captured, reports Virginia's News & Messenger
"McCrary reportedly says the perpetrator seems to have a sexual disorder called piquerism, meaning the attacker gets sexual gratification from stabbing, pricking or cutting with a sharp object. "He's driven to this," McCrary told the News & Messenger. "If he's in his late 20s, this is a little late for it to be his first time out. Chances are he's done something like this before. Police, I'm sure, are going to go back and look for similar crimes," the AP report concluded.
Say what!? Ex-FBI profiler Gregg McCrary said, "He's driven to this?" By a "sexual disorder..."
Okay, let's give the FBI profiler the benefit of the doubt and let's decide that men are "driven to this... by a sexual disorder..."
What "sexual disorder" could be driving men to attack women? Certainly that's a relevant and even necessary question if, as the FBI spokesperson tells us, men are "driven to slash women's butts."
THE WAR AGAINST WOMEN CAN ONLY BECOME UNDERSTANDABLE AFTER WE UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE LAW OF GOD AND THE LAW OF THE JUNGLE
The easiest way to understand the difference between the Law of God and the Law of the Jungle is to recognize that what Charles Darwin and his friends called the theory of evolution was nothing more than an explanation of the way the Law of the Jungle rules life. And it was this new explanation of Life that was to replace the explanation found in the Holy Bible.
Anyone who examines the last three centuries will admit this has been the fundamental battle being waged on earth since the French Revolution until today. This is the story of History that must be grasped before we can understand the War Against Women (WAW).
Today's War Against Women is the latest in a long series of wars of revolution that have periodically turned this planet into a blood bath over the last few centuries.
Darwinian evolution raises the law of the jungle to become the creator/god of life on earth when it identifies the survival of the fittest as the mechanism that causes both individuals and species to evolve. With this theory the survival of the fittest replaces the Will of the Creator as the active agent which causes things to be the way they are in reality. Instead of God saying "Let their be light", the Darwinists believe there is the fittest member of the species overcoming through brute force any obstacle to that individual's survival, and it was this process of the survival of the fittest that led to today's generation of people on earth being able to see the light.
To the deluded souls who believe such patent poppycock to be true, the law of the jungle becomes the operative law that rules the real world, the operative law of the only god they will acknowlege on earth.
It is in this context that the War Against Women can become understandable.
Law of Jungle and Law in the Kingdom of God
Expecting men to submit to being deprived of their natural dominance is like expecting lions to do the same. After all, men who have been trained to believe they are nothing more than animals, naked apes who have been created with power so much greater than the male lion that there is no comparison, cannot be expected to politely decide they are to be equal to women, or perhaps even dominated by them. The lion will roar and slash and tear...the lion will kill.
THE WEALTHIEST, MOST POWERFUL MEN ON EARTH ARE USING WOMEN AS THEIR TROOPS TO PROVE THE LAW OF THE JUNGLE RULES ON EARTH AND THEREBY DESTROY THE LAW OF GOD
In this generation, the wealthiest, most powerful men on earth are absolutely convinced that the God described in the Holy Bible--ANY HOLY BIBLE--is not only a myth, but a lie. These rich and powerful men are absolutely convinced of this, not because they have explored the edges of the universe and there found no such God, but because they have decided to believe no such God exists.
Going into the third century now, the most powerful, wealthiest, most creative people on earth have increasingly committed themselves and the people they controlled to proving that Darwin's theory was justified in elevating Charles Darwin to the House of Lords where his ideas would rule over all the people in the realm and on earth.
The War against women is only one consequence of this drive of the richest, most powerful men on the planet to usurp the Will of the Creator described in the Law of God as the True Creator of life and replace the Will of God with the will of the fittest creatures on earth--who, as you know if you will allow yourself to think about it, will always be the richest, most powerful men on earth.
MEN WILL RULE NO MATTER WHAT WOMEN WANT
Behind the push to establish the Law of the Jungle as the basis for Law on earth is the knowledge that the male rules in the Jungle.
Every man knows that when push comes to shove, almost any full grown man can literally overpower almost any woman alive and make her do his will. This fact of the physical dominance of the male over the female is the essence, the structuring principle, of the Law of the Jungle because the fact holds true in all species of predators on earth--except of course those species that provide the exception that proves the Law of the Jungle, the exceptions that will become women's first priority in defining.
The idea that man would be willing to surrender that natural physical superiority over the woman--especially when the people have been trained to believe that the survival of the fittest is the engine of survival itself--is, if not the most preposterous idea that can be uttered, one of the top three.
To expect a man, or men, to decide to allow women to become their equals would be exactly like expecting a male lion to decide to allow the lioness to become his equal in ruling the pride of lions.
The law of the jungle would forbid such a male lion from living. As a matter of fact, the lionesses would themselves kill such a rogue male lion since they understand that the rule of the lion depends on the male of the species not only proving dominance but exercising that dominance to perpetuate the species.
But today, the rich and powerful men of our species, secure in their wealth and the power it buys, know they are impregnable from such preposterous ideas that women can ever be man's equal when the Law of the Jungle is the Law that rules the world. But the rich and powerful men also know something else: they know that to the men who are not rich and powerful, but men still, foisting women over them when those women have been trained to act like they are the man's equal is exactly like waving a red flag in front of a bull, or, more precisely, like taunting the male lion of the pride to prove the power the law of the jungle gives him.
It is this dynamic that explains why the rich and powerful men of the world intend to use the daily revolts of individual men against women who try to usurp their role as the evidence that a global government is required to provide the women with the equality that the women's rights movement demands.
PUSH FOR GLOBAL GOVERNMENT EXPLAINS WHY WAR AGAINST WOMEN IS BEING WAGED BY THE RICH AND POWERFUL MEN OF THE WORLD
It's easy to dismiss the War Against Women as just an offshoot of the War Against Muslim Terrorists. But we ignore the obvious when we ignore that to Muslim terrorists Christians are seen to be a mere extension of the secular governments they are attempting to terrorize.
Even those working hardest to ignore the War Against Women admit that many Muslims fighting in the War Against Terror are driven by rage against the secular revolution that has as one of its most obvious characteristics the elevation of women to power over men.
Like the rapists, Muslim bombers, even Muslim women bombers--suicide and not suicide--often target women and children because of the terroristic rage against them for tolerating the secular revolution.
The nexus between the rage against women and the Muslim terrorist can be seen to be a paradigm for all the rage manifested in the War Against Women (WAW),
AS THE NORWAY MASSACRE DEMONSTRATES, IT'S NOT JUST MUSLIMS FIGHTING THE WAR AGAINST WOMEN
The death toll is now at 77 in the Norway Terror Rampage accomplished by Anders Behring Breivik acting alone. The majority of the people he massacred were young women, making him one of the most obviously self-directed soldiers in the War Against Women (WAW).
Do you see why the government in Norway found Breivik to be insane? He believed "he is chosen to decide who is to live and who is to die..." the authorities concluded.
When you understand that Breivik's alleged insanity is based on the fact that he believed he could decide who is to live and who is to die, and then when you realize that the law in secular nations around the world have decreed that women can decide whether their unborn babies are to live or to die, then you will see that the exact idea that caused Brivik to be decreed to be insane is a "right" women have been given in codified law in most of the developed nations on earth. In this remarkable juxtaposition of an apparently insane man with the "rights" of women to decide whether their unborn children live or die we see the fundamental anomaly that explains where the War Against Women is coming from.
|Breivik's War Against Women Demonstrates the Limits of Diversity|
Without being insensitive to the horror of dozens of young people being gunned down by a man who appears to be more likely to show up on a fashion runway than dressed like a policeman methodically intent on murdering everyone in sight, it is necessary to point out that this event is designed to give the world an opportunity to examine the limits of diversity.
What Has This Got To Do With Diversity?
Fact 1: The massacre occurred at a Youth Camp being conducted by Norway's ruling Labor Party described in news accounts as a "left-wing" Political Party.
Fact 2: Breivik is described as a Christian Fundamentalist.
Warriors like Brievik and the myriad other men like him who demonstrate what bloody, murderous revolt looks like up close and personal, prove that there is a limit to what men will tolerate without massacring those around them.
Women are the key to opening the door to stop the War Against Women but before they will help open that door, women apparently must be shown the horrible War Against Women.
WHY MEN OF POWER WANT THE WAR AGAINST WOMEN TO CONTINUE
Whereas women have always had the power to control social conventions, the time when women could be seen to be controlling the decrees of codified law is a relatively recent development in recorded history. And it is precisely that change in the role of women on earth that has thrust women into the increasingly horrible War Against Women (WAW) we see growing around us today.
It is The power of women to carry the balance of power in establishing codified law in government that, more than anything else, is behind the War Against Women (WAW).
Men as diverse as the ones pictured below are actively engaged in the War Against Women (WAW).
While most men do not want to go to war against women, would in fact sign a peace treaty today, the richest, most powerful men on this planet do not want the WAW to stop. Those men are actually using all the power of the various institutions of modern society to manipulate women into doing that which makes the growth of the WAW inevitable.
Of the men pictured below, can you distinguish the ones who want the War Against Women to stop from those who want to see the War Against Women grow until it leads to a global conflagration history will name World War III? Look closely. You will be surprised to see who is who.
TO UNDERSTAND THE WAR AGAINST WOMEN YOU MUST SEE THE POWER OF THE NARRATIVE TO CONTROL THE WORLD
The power of the narrative is the power that is presently waging the War Against Women (WAW).
The narrative is controlled by those who own the various world communication media like education, government, news, entertainment, etc. Those global organizations have a common narrative that has organized the various forces that make up the War Against Women (WAW). And it is that narrative that is launching those forces of war against women and against each other like the gods hurling lightning bolts.
The name of the narrative is globalization. That's what Satan's men are waging war to accomplish.
THE NARRATIVE THAT WILL CHANGE THE WORLD
The New York Times recently reported on Barack O'Bama's narrative. By looking at Barack O'Bama's narrative, you can see the power that a narrative has to control the world. The Times reported, "Last summer, as Bill and Hillary Rodham Clinton celebrated the former president’s 65th birthday with a party at their rented Hamptons home, talk among their guests turned to President Obama’s travails over the debt crisis and doubts about his re-election. “I’m really trying to help him,” the white-haired former president said, shaking his head, “but he seems to have lost his narrative.”
So this much is obvious from Clinton's words: the President has a "narrative" that he has "lost."
But what is the narrative? Do you know? Do you have a theory?
Globalization is the narrative Bill Clinton referred to, the narrative that President Obama has "lost," the narrative that Bill Clinton wants to help him find. I focus on that narrative because it is the narrative that Bill Clinton referred to that has caused the War Against Women, that is behind the death spiral we see going balls to the wall around us.
Bill Clinton understands the globalization narrative as well as anyone on earth because Bill Clinton embodies that narrative. He doesn't talk about it in public much, but if you could sit in the board rooms or in conference rooms or in the meetings of the high and mighty world leaders, you would hear Bill Clinton speak as if it were a fore-gone conclusion that a global government will rule the world...and soon.
GLOBALIZATION THROUGH SEXUAL LICENTIOUSNESS
Built within the meaning of globalization is a narrative about sexual licentiousness. It is this narrative of sexual "liberation" that is going to create a global government. It is this narrative that Bill Clinton thinks Barack Obama has "lost".
Picture Bill Clinton sitting in the Oval Office of the White House receiving fellatio from a teenage intern while he speaks on the phone conducting the official business of the USA and you have in microcosm the narrative Bill Clinton understands Barack Obama has lost. To Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, instead of being the leader of the Free World's migration into the brave, new world of sexual liberation, of freedom from the myths of the past, of freedom from the bankrupt laws of God, Obama has become just another President who has "lost the narrative."
But in this world, when one powerful agency like the government of the USA "loses" the narrative, the mass news media can be trusted to "find" it again because men like Ted Turner control the mass media.
THE MASS MEDIA OF COMMUNICATION CONTROL THE NARRATIVE THAT HAS CREATED THE WAR AGAINST WOMEN
Ted Turner gave one billion dollars to create a thing called The United Nations Foundation. Writing on Oct 31, 2011, Turner says, "One of the smartest investments I ever made was my $1 billion gift to the United Nations, which led to the creation of the United Nations Foundation. The United Nations is the only institution with the international scale, reach and capacity to address today's toughest challenges. If we want to ensure that we leave our children and grandchildren a safe and healthy world, then it is critical for world leaders to support the U.N.'s vital work on voluntary family planning and reproductive health for women across the globe...The time is now. The investments we make today will shape the world we leave the next generation. If the United States wants to maintain its global leadership role, we must be thinking and making smart investments that will help us address both current and future responsibilities. The best way to do this is to listen to women and fund international family planning (emphasis mine). Our future depends on it," Ted Turner stated with the resources capable of making his prophesy self-fulfilling.
The role the mass media plays in creating and controlling the modern world in developed nations is so obvious that it is like the oxygen we breathe, only noticed when it is replaced by some unbeatable, unsustainable, toxic gas. The media of education, news, entertainment, government coax consensus in the modern age by using all the tools of marketing ever more effectively each day that passes.
To date, the mass media has only just begun to suck the oxygen out of the world and replace it with toxic gas that has no power to sustain life. But watch men like Ted Turner and the other magnates of the mass media and you can easily see the men who have created the War Against Women (WAW).
Most everyone on earth knows that change in the relationship between men and women has been in motion for centuries. But most people have only the vaguest inkling that powerful people have chosen the relationship between men and women as the next change that must occur before the way is opened to create lasting worldwide change in the government of earth.
Turner doesn't care about women. Like Satan, he and his ilk use women to lead the whole world into war with God.
BEHIND THE WAR AGAINST WOMEN IS THE WAR AGAINST GOD
There is a reason behind all this attention on women's role in the world. And it's the same reason the population bomb has been preached by the secular prophets of the world for the last fifty years: the threat of the population explosion justifies butchering babies by the millions, giving a license to perverted and licentious sex to every person on earth; and finally is intended to drive the wooden stake into this world's enemy: Almighty God the Creator of the Universe, the one identified as the True Satan by the leaders of the New World Order, the New Age. By persuading women to see themselves as the leaders whose duty it is to control the Population Bomb so that it never explodes on earth, the powerful men who control the governments of earth believe that changing the relationship between men and women will overrule the idea of the authority of God and lead to dominoes falling in such a pattern that the world--male and female homo sapiens--will inevitably embrace, accept, adopt, a government with the power to rule every nation on earth, a government that has no loyalty to, or pays cognizance to, the Law of God.
Women are being trained to see themselves as the pivot upon which history will turn. It is easy to prove this because only this week the world's news media has chosen to make the story of women's role in controlling the Population Bomb the story of the week:
So how did women defuse the POPULATION BOMB? They killed all the babies they didn't want to have, one way or another, that's how.
Of course this article is the only place you'll find a writer who will come right out and actually say how women defused the population bomb, but that's because everybody except the children people choose to live already knows how women defused the population bomb but just won't admit it...especially to their children.
TWO DIFFERENT NARRATIVES VIE TO DEFINE THE WAR AGAINST WOMEN
The War Against Women (WAW) begins either in the Garden of Eden or the Big Bang Creation Account, depending on which narrative you choose to believe.
And that is the point. Each person on earth chooses a narrative that defines for them the meaning not only of the things in this Universe but the Universe itself.
Throughout recorded history narratives have been presented that vied for people's belief. Pharaoh presented a narrative to his people just like Caesar did just like the Jewish Prophets did, like Moses did, like Mohammed did, like Jesus did. The narratives were different in various particulars but the goal of the narratives were the same: to persuade people to accept them as the definitive explanation for the meaning of things in the universe.
Today there is a conflict between two narratives, a battle to the death, and women have been chosen as the key participants in this conflict.
To see what I'm talking about, notice that from the perspective of the narrative found in the story of the Garden of Eden, the place where the narrative begins historically held to be true by Muslims, Christians and Jews, the War Against Women has been ongoing since the Garden of Eden.
Pitted against this narrative of the Garden of Eden is another narrative that carries the imprimatur of science in the world today: they call it the theory of Evolution. In this theory there not only was no Garden of Eden but there was no Being, no Creator-God who said let there be light and there was light. But instead the universe came into being because of an explosion of undetermined origins that set in motion a series of events that led to the evolution of the things we see around us in the universe today.
These two conflicting narratives are at war with each other and the War Against Women is only one theater in that much greater War.
The Garden of Eden narrative provides an adequate explanation for the War we see growing around us today, except were the Garden of Eden account to be given its full authority, we would be forced to admit that we are talking not about a War Against Women, we are talking about a War Against God.
According to the historic interpretation of the narrative found in the Old Testament of the Bible, the War Against Women was preceded by a Another War, a War Against God launched by Satan sometime between the time described in Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 3:1. It is that war that provides the context for the balls to the wall war against women gaining velocity every day that passes today.
The Bible doesn't spend a lot of time talking about how that war began, but it makes it clear Satan started it and that God created Adam and Eve to prove to Satan that God had the power to create a creature made out of dirt, a creature who had the power to overrule Satan, the mightiest Angel God had made.
THE NARRATIVE PITTED AGAINST THE GARDEN OF EDEN
In this present generation, a consensus exists among a huge number of people all across this planet, powerful people, educated people, wealthy people. And that consensus is convinced that there never was a Being out there who said anything to bring the present universe into being. These people believe the ability to say anything remotely similar to what people say when they use words was an ability that grew over millions of years out of the process of natural selection because there never was a Being who is Infinity and who is Omniscient and who is Omnipotent and who is Omnipresent. They believe that people who believed such a Being actually exists in reality were deluded by their inability to explain reality into making up a narrative where such a Being was created to fill in the parts of the universe that people could not understand for themselves. Today those people have finally figured out, with the help of great thinkers who preceded them that God is not Infinite, not Omniscient, not Omnipotent, not presently that is. They have concluded that God is BECOMING things: infinite, omniscient, omnipotent, omni-everything. They have concluded that God is not perfect and complete; they have concluded that God is BECOMING perfect and complete.
And with that narrative firmly believed as the New Narrative that explains reality, the powerful men of the world have determined to prove that they are in fact GOD in the flesh.
In the few centuries this new theory has held sway over the wealthy, over the powerful men of the earth, much attention has been devoted to explaining the universe these men presently believe they occupy. Few words explain the universe they believe they occupy better than the words penned in a poem by Wallace Stevens entitled
Such words have created a Tsunami of rage. Ted Turner and his ilk don't care. In fact they look to the War Against Women to provide them with the unending crisis that will allow them to justify creating a global government to "protect the women and children."
Final Soliloquy of the Interior Paramour
Light the first light of evening
In which we rest and, for small reason, think
The world imagined is the ultimate good.
This is, therefore, the intensest rendevouz.
It is in that thought that we collect ourselves,
Out of all the indifferences, into one thing:
Within a single thing, a single shawl
Wrapped tightly round us, since we are poor, a warmth
A light, a power, the miraculous influence.
Here, now, we forget each other and ourselves.
We feel the obscurity of an order, a whole,
A knowledge, that which arranged the rendevouz.
Within its vital boundary, in the mind.
We say God and the imagination are one...
How high that highest candle lights the dark.
Out of this same light, out of the central mind,
We make a dwelling in the evening air,
In which being there together is enough.
And women are the ones Ted Turner and Bill Clinton and their powerful male peers throughout the developed nations look to do their heavy lifting.
Ted Turner and most of the most powerful men on this planet want war to provide them with sanction for the globalization of government on this planet, the one-world government they think is the inevitable and necessary next step in history.
WHY WOULD THE MOST POWERFUL MEN ON EARTH CHOOSE WOMEN AS THEIR PAWNS?
|The power that women have to effect every aspect of a man's being is obvious from day one--meaning day one of recorded history as well as day one of any man's life.|
PUSSYPOWER HAS ALWAYS CONTROLLED SOCIAL CONVENTIONS, WHAT JESUS CALLED "THE TRADITIONS OF MEN"
When Jesus Christ talked about what was translated as "the traditions of men" a much more accurate and helpful translation would have been to call what He was talking about "the traditions of society". Then it would have been easier to see that Jesus Christ understood that that social conventions were always dominated by the will of women, even when women were defined by codified law as chattel property of the men they were bound to in society.
Probably in no society was this more true than in the England.
In addition to providing the United States of America with most of its legal tractions, England provided the USA with the power structure that determined social conventions.
The historian, Wesley Frank Craven's, wrote White, Red, and Black where he examined census and other extant records from Virginia in 1713. Craven believes "there were enough Englishwomen present to determine social conventions... (emphasis mine)".
Bingo. From the earliest days in this nation, Englishwomen "determine social conventions..." That's because Englishwomen had long determined social conventions in England. It is that underlying fact that explains why the powerful men of today have turned to women to be the soldiers in their revolution to establish a global government. And it is why the backlash I call the War Against Women (WAW) is occurring.
It is that fact that underlies why men like Ted Turner have chosen to use the threats against "women's rights" as a tool with the power to forge a new one-world government.
Their strategy is obvious now: Prove the present governments cannot protect women's rights and show how a one-world government can do it and there you have it, the strategy for world government change. Get the women to get "their" men to establish a global government that will protect their rights from all those dinosaurs who refuse women their rights and you see the political landscape of today, you see the actual contours of our present historical context.
THOMAS HARDY AND JUDE THE OBSCURE SHOW HOW WOMEN USE PUSSYPOWER TO CONTROL THEIR MEN BOTH IN THE PAST AND TODAY
What follows is so obvious that everybody knows it, but because it is rarely if ever discussed in public, it is time to state the obvious.
Thomas Hardy was an English novelist when the novel was a form of mass media with a potential audience impact similar to a major motion picture today. In other words the novel could be a vehicle for the formation of a common social point of view as only mass entertainment or news media or education or political campaigns can do today.
Since Thomas Hardy wrote a novel about how women can control not only the men in their lives but the society around them as well, it is helpful to examine that novel and how it continues to have its impact in our world today.
Jude The Obscure was Hardy's last novel of a string of increasingly successful English novels. Published in 1895, Jude the Obscure met with strong outcry from the Victorian public for its frank treatment of sex, and was often referred to as Jude the Obscene for its apparent attack on the institution of marriage.
In 1996 a major motion picture adapted Hardy's novel to the screen, except now it was called simply Jude because it was obvious there was nothing obscure about it.
Take for example the fact that the couple in Hardy's novel never got married but lived together for months without ever having sex because, well, you'd have to read the novel. But the point is they eventually not only had sex but had children as well.
And that's how Thomas Hardy demonstrated that the couple, the stars of his novel, had finally had sexual intercourse: he merely mentioned in the narrative that they had a child. No details of their sexual intercourse, no details at all. It was obscure.
But when you look at how the same story was handled in 1996, you will see how far the sexual revolution has progressed in one hundred years. This is the pivotal dialogue from both Hardy's novel and from the 1996 film:
First Sue tells Jude: I'm not afraid of any man.
Jude: Why Not?
Sue: Because no man will touch a woman unless she invites him to. Until she says with a look or a smile, come on, he's always afraid. If you never say it, or look it, he'll never come on. You're the timid sex.
So far the novel and the movie are the same.
But remember how in Thomas Hardy's novel not a syllable of description described what happened in the bedroom when Sue Bridehead finally gave up her virginity to Jude?
Now look below and you will see the actual picture from the 1996 film "Jude" of the pivotal moment in the story when Sue Bridehead finally let Jude "come on." Jude is no longer "obscure" at all.
It is not news that women would expose the crack in their vagina to those who paid for their services: that has been going on since time immemorial. What is news is that Christian women would teach their men and their children that they are doing the will of God by ignoring such blatant sexual licentiousness in society.
Do you see the difference in the social conventions in 1896 and 1996?
If you are a Christian, probably not. That's because Christians have been conditioned to ignore the evil growing around them. Their "pastors"--led by the women they serve--have convinced Christians that denial of evil is the same as deliverance from that evil.
For those who do not intend to find their way of life by ignoring evil, the words Jane Bridehead told Jude in the movie, words that were taken from Thomas Hardy's novel, will go a long way toward explaining the reality of English social conventions that were transported whole cloth to the United States of America.
Sue:I'm not afraid of any man.
Jude: Why Not?
Sue: Because no man will touch a woman unless she invites him to. Until she says with a look or a smile, come on, he's always afraid. If you never say it, or look it, he'll never come on. You're the timid sex.
In England, women took over from law enforcement the enforcement of sexual sin laws, thinking the government was heavy-handed and insensitive to the dangers law enforced created. Using the churches as this primary controlling device, relations between the sexes became controlled by women both in the home and in society as well.
Thomas Hardy's novel and the Film Jude both demonstrated how Christian women held the balance of power that made it impossible for Jude and Sue, once they decided to thwart the Christian social consensus concerning the necessity of marriage as a sanction for sexual intercourse, had the power to destroy Jude's ability to make a living for his family in England.
|Hardy symbolized this reality by having Jude be a stone mason who depended on Christian churches for the bulk of his work. As the scene to the right shows, as Sue and Jude's family grew, the reality of their "unconventional" family life was obvious to all.|
Here we see the pivotal moment in both the book and the film as the Christian women of the church look disdainfully on Jude and his family as they work in the church.
Jude is shortly discharged from working in churches. His family begins to starve and absolute disaster befalls Jude and Sue and their family.
In conclusion, Sue is overwhelmed by guilt and leaves Jude, who everybody knows is the true love of her life and vice versa. Sue does penance by admitting that the women in the church were right all along, and showing up at church every time the doors open.
It is in response to exactly this kind of social criticism of the role of women in Christianity that led today's Christian women to literally abandon Christendom to Satan.
CHRISTIAN WOMEN ABANDON CHRISTENDOM TO SATAN
Story of Jude the Obscure demonstrates how the social control system worked about 100 years ago in England. Look at American Christianity today and you will see an institutional church that is dominated by women who have been conditioned to think that anything they do to impose any restrictions upon the sexual behavior of other people is a sin because it creates exactly the unloving and counterproductive results we see in the narration of Jude the Obscure.
Needless to say the unbelieving world who is being conditioned to see the pursuit of the Unfettered Orgasm as the essence of the meaning of Freedom says Amen to the Christian women who have decided to tolerate every form of sexual licentiousness rather than use the power of the law--either the unwritten power of social conventions, or the written power of codified law--to force the world to control its libido.
This confused decision to abandon the role that Christian women once played in Christendom has resulted in a world that has gone to War Against Women (WAW).
Face it Christian women! You have removed the barrier the law once placed between sexual licentiousness and society. By removing the barrier the law had created between the unlicensed libido and Satan, Christian women have made the War Against Women inevitable by forcing God, in accordance to Romans 1:24,25, to withdraw His Grace and Protection from women and men everywhere.
The power of women is inescapable. From the day of Eve until today, women can be seen to be the pool from which society, civilization, drinks.
Women, especially Christian women, have refused to honor God as God and thereby brought themselves into a Romans 1 Judgment where God has turned women over to the terrible attacks this world can bring against women. And it has all happened because men, especially Christian men, have acted like the first Adam, and instead of protecting women from Satan's lies, have themselves surrendered to women by plugging themselves into the Pussypower Grid.
The War Against Women is the result. The Lesbian Spirit is the result.
WOMEN HAVE SURRENDERED TO THE LESBIAN SPIRIT
The essence of the lesbian spirit is the idea that a woman can provide another woman with superior sexual experiences than any man can provide. For a graphic example of the lesbian spirit, watch this youtube video where a lesbian uses reverse psychology to get people to listen to her make her pitch selling the sexual chemistry created when to females fornicate: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gSP6p2N6Vfw.
Apparently, given the rise of overt lesbianism, this attraction, this allure of the flesh, is a powerful temptation to test the lesbian premise.
And of course once the lesbian premise has been tested it is impossible for most women to deny that they are, at least to some extent, a lesbian; in the same sense that if a man sucks another man's penis, for the rest of his life, he's a cock sucker.
This creation of solidarity to the spirit of the lesbian is the basis for the majority decision in the USA to legalize homosexual relations.
At its root, the lesbian spirit is a taunt to every man, a rejection of every man, and a source of rage we see exploding around us every day in the War Against Women (WAW).
WHY HAS THE LESBIAN SPIRIT BEEN ABLE TO GAIN SUCH POWER?
Experience would prove that from time immemorial the mutual decision between a man and a woman to bring a child into the world has never--or hardly ever---been a basis for sexual relations between a man and a woman. Sexual relations were the result of a libido drive that most often resulted in children being produced. In exactly the way a lion mounts his lioness, people mounted each other.
Rarely were these matters of sexual behavior ever resolved at the level of a good faith decision between the people involved and the God and Father of the Lord Jesus Christ. Churches, using all the power of the institutions of Christianity, forged social and ecclesiastical conventions that had the power to hold families together insofar as they were held together. As a result, when children came, the social convention was to not kill them even if they were perceived to be an inconvenience.
Today, all those social and ecclesiastical conventions have been destroyed. Legalized abortion proves that destruction.
Since the decisions of married people were made between the couple and society, not God, when society began to relax its sanctions designed to hold married couples together until death do them part, then we see a world develop like the one around us today, a world that murders people if the majority deems their presence to be inconvenient.
THE LESBIAN SPIRIT IS THE REAL DRIVING FORCE IN THE REVOLUTION, THE REVOLUTION LET LOOSE BY THE TED TURNER'S OF THE WORLD
Robin Wright, as the most prescient of women writers who saw long before most that the Muslim reaction to the movement toward global government would be the sword that either catapulted Islam to world leadership or would, conversely, be destroyed by the leaders of the War on Terror.
Ms. Wright said, "Globalization—or the traumatic transition to it—may also intensify personal affiliations with faith. Vast numbers from diverse faiths will want a local identity during change that redefines the patterns of governance and alliances, economics and trade, the media and culture. The church, the temple, the synagogue, and the mosque are all pillars to cling to during the transition’s tornados."
Recognizing the truth of her own words, no writer has been more persistent than Ms. Wright in developing the narrative that Muslim women are taking the lead in the movement toward globalization. Ms. Wright says in her latest book, "Among women, Nonuse An sari, a Muslim engineer and businesswoman, was the first female space tourist. In 2006, she spent eight days at the International Space Station helping with experiments. In 2010, Ri ma Faith became Ri ma Faith, the first Muslim to be crowned Miss USA."
Do you think "the first Muslim to be crowned Miss USA" made us many friends among those considering Jihad?
As you look at what the world saw American culture is doing to a Muslim women, you are being given an opportunity to test your reaction to the lesbian spirit.
Am I saying that "Ri ma Faith, the first Muslim to be crowned Miss USA" is a lesbian?
Probably not. What I am saying is she represent the spirit of the lesbian. The lesbian spirit is that determination to destroy all barriers that try to prevent a woman from doing anything she wants to do, from making any choice she wants.
If you remember the famous scene from the science fiction epic, "Starship Troopers" where men and women in the military of the future were as a matter of policy assigned the duty to shower together, and as you saw that all the men and women in the shower had been conditioned to see nothing wrong or disruptive or evil about it, you saw the lesbian spirit as it had evolved in the future.
When the lesbian spirit took over the women's rights movement, the War Against Women that we see raging around us today became inevitable.
Summarizing her view of the Muslim world today, Ms. Wright tells us, "The Middle East will, unquestionably, continue to spur anxiety, threaten security, and drain resources. Yet even as the war in Iraq steadily escalated and the United States was increasingly discredited on democracy promotion, the majority of the people in the Middle East still wanted the kind of political change that has swept the rest of the world over the past quarter century."
In essence, the lesbian spirit is not a rejection of a woman's sexual power over a man. It is the expansion of a woman's sexual power over men and women. The lesbian spirit declares that women get to choose and have the power to make their choices rule the world.
Repeat: The lesbian spirit has taken over the women's rights movement. It was inevitable that it would happen when women decided that the men were no longer necessary to the vital function of a woman. In other words when women decided that their role, happiness, and purpose for living was no longer the bearing and raising of children, then the lesbian spirit had achieved hegemony over the spirit of the woman, the spirit of the woman that had vied for control over men since Eve. That spirit was replaced by the spirit of the lesbian that believes bearing and raising children has nothing necessarily with being a woman. The lesbian spirit is merely an extension of the spirit of the man who has, since the Fall, always had an almost impossible time seeing the necessity and purpose of children.
So the War Against Women is actually a War against the spirit that has decided children are not created in the image of God with all the rights God gives every person, but instead children have been defined by the lesbian spirit that is the spirit of the man, to be commodities to be held or sold as the profit motive of the owner of the commodity determines is in the best interest of the commodity owner. Exactly as the slave was once perceived to be nothing more than a commodity whose value was measurable in terms of the work performed, so, too, are children now defined by the lesbian spirit that has taken over the women of the world and created the backlash of the War Against Women. The fact that the vast majority of women in the world today not only tolerate the lesbian spirit but actually are being conditioned to find sexual allure in the lesbian spirit is the root cause of the War Against Women, and unless women want the War Against Women to grow until the relatively rare attacks against women become so endemic as to make it clear that the survival of the Mother is at stake, women around the world will begin to realize the grave danger posed to the survival of our species by the lesbian spirit.
The History of the Women's Rights Movement and the War Against Women
There is no way to report on the War Against Women without understanding that the women's rights movement has led today to the War Against Women.
But even that statement, which merely points out that in ages past there has never been anything remotely similar to today's no holds barred War Against Women, carries with it the seeds of absolute rejection of this report on the War Against Women because the report is written by, gasp, a man.
Built within the Women's Rights Movement is the idea that there would never have needed to be a movement in favor of women's right unless men had deprived women of those rights. Upon this idea, the idea that men have deprived women of their rights and that women must fight to obtain those rights, is the logic of at least the battle between the sexes and perhaps the logic of the War Against Women as well. As long as life is defined as a place where women have to battle men to achieve their rights, then men are alerted by this logic to see themselves at battle with women as well. Upon such logic is the War Against Women sustained.
But today the battle between the sexes has reached a place never before seen in history. Even when it is fully admitted that women deserve equal rights with men, that admission does not change the fact that today women have been given the right to do something that no man is admitted to do at law: choose to kill their own child and receive the right to do that killing upon demand.
The War Against Women can be traced to the time when women began to receive not equal rights with men but the rights to do things that no man was legally allowed to do.
Let's trace that process. It's easy to do because whereas from the beginning women have had the power, as Zerubbabel pointed out in 1 Esdras, the power to rule men and society unofficially using the innate power of their sex, the time came when women began to demand the power to rue, not merely the unwritten rules we call social conventions, but to rule the codified laws that people carrying weapons were authorized to force upon every person in this nation.
This point is important because it is tracing the change from women's power to control social conventions to the time, today, when women can be seen to be the source for codified law, that we can see where women began to be perceived to be worthy of waging war against.
Understanding that women were duped by powerful men into demanding not equal rights with men but superior rights to men as a way to foment the War Against Women so that women could be used to create the political conditions ushering in a one-world government is a story that has not been told to date.
You are reading that story now.
UNDERSTANDING THE RAGE AGAINST WOMEN
Unless the men who are being driven to rage against women wake up and realize what is happening in this world today, the enraged men being driven to bloody revolt will find themselves to have been mere pawns in the most ambitious, boldest move Satan has ever launched on earth, and unless the men of this generation, both believer and unbeliever pay close attention, enraged men will end up walking like lemmings into world-wide slavery to the men of power like Ted Turner and his ilk.
To avoid that outcome, it is necessary to examine closely the rage against women that is being fueled in this world today.
SACRED RAGE AND RAGE IN THE FLESH
Current events gives myriad examples of the rage that is being revealed in the War Against Women (WAW). But current events does little if nothing to explain the rage we see around us in the news on a daily basis. To understand the rage it is helpful to see that there are at least two different kinds of rage being revealed.
1. Rage in the flesh. This rage is created when women reject individual men and leave them raging, literally boiling in their own fleshly juices. Most people understand that rage most readily because it is the stuff out of which the battle between the sexes has been fueled since time immemorial. I will return to this most common form of rage later in this article because it plays a very important role in the plan for world domination women are being deployed to accomplish.
2. Sacred Rage. This rage bears the closest examination because it is the most dangerous rage that can be imagined.
A woman named Robin Wright staked out a claim as an authority on sacred rage when she wrote a book in 1985 entitled SACRED RAGE: The Wrath of Militant Islam. The picture above is taken from that book.
When her book was published, the Philadelphia Enquirer was one voice among many who said, "This book tells more about the roots and goals of Shi'ite terrorism than any top-clearance intelligence briefing."
Now remember she wrote her book long before 9/11, even before the Twin Towers were bombed the first time, before anyone, including Robin Wright, had ever heard of Osama bin Laden.
But she recognized in 1985 that Iran's Ayatollah Khomeni represented a potentially world changing revolution, one fueled by the rage of men. Khomeni said, "It is our duty now to implement and put into practice the plan of government established by Islam...We will create a strong new current of thought and a powerful popular movement that will result in the establishment of an Islamic government."
Robin Wright explained that the Ayatollah Khomeni's words were not directed toward Iran alone, "Iran was the vanguard or nucleus around which the Islamic umma (the Muslim community) could be constructed as successive Muslim countries threw off their chains and restored authentic Islamic government...Like the French Revolution of 1789 and the Russian Revolution of 1917, the Iranian revolution was based on principles of universal applicability, and implicitly threatened all the regimes in the neighborhood, if not in the whole world."
THE WAR ON TERROR AND THE WAR AGAINST WOMEN
The War on Terror has been constructed to exacerbate the War Against Women. In other words, the leaders of the secular world, believing they can use the War Against Terror to construct a one-world government, have seized upon using women and the role of women in the world as the means of constantly goading the Muslim Rage into unceasing attacks against the secular world, both within and without Muslim nations, and the secular war leaders who desire a one-world government intend to use these attacks against women and against what women perceive as the rights of women as a way to convince the vast majority of people in the world that a one-world government is the necessary form of governmental control required to stanch the rage that is fueling the War Against Women (WAW).
PERSONIFICATION OF THE WOMEN ASKING TO BE TREATED AS COMBATANTS
This is the actual picture the 20 year old woman whose post on the Internet made her an international icon of the womens rights movement circa November, 2011.
The nude photos are just the latest provocation by the young Egyptian revolution with the mission of “doing the echo of the cries against a society of violence, racism, sexism, sexual harassment and hypocrisy.” It goes back a few weeks ago the curious initiative “Men should wear a veil”, in which many participated by sending photos of men in hijabs, designed to protest against the wearing of the veil imposed on women in Muslim countries.
According to the CNN article cited earlier, Elmahdy describes herself as an atheist. When asked why she posted the picture, she explained, "I am not shy of being a woman in a society where women are nothing but sex objects harassed on a daily basis by men who know nothing about sex or the importance of a woman...The photo is an expression of my being and I see the human body as the best artistic representation of that. I took the photo myself using a timer on my personal camera. The powerful colors black and red inspire me."
PERFECT EXAMPLES OF WHY THE WAR AGAINST WOMEN OCCURS
Nothing more perfectly explains the provocation of women that has led to the War Against Women than this young lady's public nudity and the idealism her nudity is designed to communicate. Every Muslim man in the world knows this woman is responding to the secular ideal represented by the United States of America.
Nothing more perfectly explains why Muslim fighting men will flock to Muslim leaders who form armies to fight the secular world that they explain is brain washing women into becoming like Aliaa Elmahdy. (If you don't understand how powerful a recruiting device women who violate Muslim taboos can be, watch the movie "Cairo Time" and you will see the kind of pressure Muslim men put on women who don't wear the veil in public. Such pressure is the role in Muslim communities throughout the world.)
Now when you see the kind of powerful taboo the role of women represents in the Muslim world, and you understand that it is the "secular world" that is being defined as the cause of Muslim women's growing violation of those taboos, then you will understand how men who encourage women in such provocative violation of existing taboos are literally turning those women into combatants in a War Against Women.
And this is exactly where the USA comes into conflict with the Muslim world because the leader of that "secular world" is the government of the United States of America.
No matter what any citizen of the United States of America would like to think about this nation, if citizens do not understand that this nation is the leader of the secular movement in the world today, that citizen is an embodiment of ignorance in the same way that Aliaa Elmahdy embodies the sexual revolution that has launched the present War Against Women (WAW).
WAR AGAINST WOMEN FUELED BY SEXUAL LICENTIOUSNESS
Both forms of rage, of terrorism against women, can be traced to the development of a sexually licentious society. But hardly anyone wants to hear this story because we have all participated in it in such yukky ways that we do not want to face what we've done and we will do what is necessary to keep our children from finding out what we have all been participating in.
THE ONLY WAY TO STOP THE WAR AGAINST WOMEN
To stop this war, God's Law must be established as the basis for government on earth. The alternative is ever growing war until World War III has arrived.
Woman can avoid this outcome. Here's how:
Women have always relied on men to establish the law. Unless a man was a slave or one of the various permutations of slave like peasant, serf, peon, etc., women trained them to be prepared to not only establish but enforce the law.
It was this idea that was the foundation upon which Code Duello was created. In other words, the duel was the outworking of the idea that a man demanded that the law be satisfied. There was no duel required between peasants and the nobility in society. Peasants were beaten like cattle into compliance with the will of the nobility. The duel was the device for establishing the law in disagreements between members of the nobility.
From time immemorial the males who were willing to put their lives at risk to establish on the spot the requirements of behavior that we call the law were the living embodiment of the meaning of the word man. Women were distinct from the man because nobody, including women, expected women to take the responsibility to establish the law in the face of any lawbreaker. Women delegated that authority to the man.
Slaves, whether male or female, were never given the authority to impose their understanding of the law, even on obvious lawbreakers. Slaves participated in the establishment of the law by going to find a man who would establish the law with lawbreakers.
These were the actual conditions that existed in every society on earth. While the names varied from society to society, the role distinctions between men and women and slaves were consistently applied across the earth.
A revolution has changed these social arrangements and everywhere only officially empowered government agents, whether male, female or whatever, are authorized to enforce the law.
While some States in the USA are clearly in transition and still allow the conditions to exist that makes it possible for any man to enforce the law, those States are vanishing rapidly from the earth as central government control deprives the individual man of both the physical means and the moral sanction to see himself as a law enforcement officer because he is a man.
At the root of this social revolution is the will of the woman who is quick to explain why this social revolution was necessary if women were to find true equality. Depriving all men of the idea that they had the right to establish the law over lawbreakers removed the power that men had used to keep women in subjugation since time immemorial.
Unfortunately for women, the decision of women to cooperate with those who would deprive men of the unique characteristic that defined a man has resulted in men making an undeclared war against women.
HOW EVIL BECOMES INSUFFERABLE
God simply stops supplying the world, or a society, or a family, or a person with His Grace. The immediate result is all the powers of death begin to grow in that person's life until death utterly consumes whatever it is that God turns over to its sins. Inevitably evil will become insufferable.
But the United States of America has not been awakened as deadly war sweeps over this nation. The USA seems far from evil that is insufferable. In fact, the USA is intent on exporting evil!
FOREIGN AID TIED TO SECULAR LAWS: BRIBING CHRISTIANS
The Form of government doesn't matter to the globalist. What matters is the government's willingness to submit to the global agenda. That's why secular Muslim leaders like those in Libya and Iraq were killed in the same way bin Laden was killed. Nothing on the horizon appears to have the power to stop those who are hellbent on forcing the world to submit to a secular one-world government. But it is this fact that will not be exposed until the USA and globalist leaders massacres Americans for trying to obeying the Founder's form of government rather than the global form.
Troy Newman and all the Christians like him serve the government of Satan because Satan admits murder of born people is against the law. But Newman refuses to admit into consciousness the fact that his decision to serve the government of Satan validates Satan's law that gives women the right to decide to murder their unborn babies if the flesh dictates a feeling of inconvenience when God creates their baby in their womb.
This is the fundamental American Evangelical Christian error that is buttressed by the false idea that the God and Father of the Lord Jesus Christ extends unconditional love in the sense that He places no conditions upon His provision of grace and His providence for people He creates, the heresy that He creates human beings to have a "sovereign will."
The War Against Women tracks directly from this fundamental error of Christian leadership in this generation.
“‘Gender liberation’ will likely be the new vogue term used to describe the tidal wave that is fast approaching the shores of the California public school system,” writes Robert Tyler, founder of Advocates for Faith & Freedom, a non-profit law firm dedicated to protecting religious liberty. “And you can be sure that it won’t stop there. It will spread throughout the nation and have disastrous consequences on the innocent."
Tyler explains what “gender liberation” means: “male-female distinctions must be eliminated in order to ‘liberate’ children from unnecessary ‘stereotypes.’ This is not a movement seeking ‘equal rights,’ but a movement seeking to obliterate our God-given distinctions between male and female.”
Corporal punishment demonstrates the limits of the egalitarianism that has been accepted as the de facto definition of freedom. As the laws allowing for corporal punishment of children are swept away, the entire teaching of Holy Scripture is swept away with them. For if God is wrong and the child should not be exposed to the rod, then Holy Scripture as a whole cannot logically be seen to be a rule and guide to life no matter how else it is interpreted.
And as anyone knows who has ever studied the Bible in depth, it is only as the entire context of the Bible is put into perspective that the full wisdom and truth about the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ is revealed.
If corporal punishment is accepted as never allowed in this world, then there is no reason to even think about arguing about proscribing abortion or homosexuality, or any activity of mankind from a Biblical foundation. Secular humanism will have vanquished Scripture to the most unHoly realm of myth reserved for the stories of the Greek and Roman pantheon and the myriad other god stories of ancient history.
But the defense of corporal punishment requires the explication of relationships among people where certain people not only have dominance overs others but can use raw, brute strength to enforce that dominance.
Thus the idea of the Father over the Mother, the Mother over the child.
Corporal punishment is not a sin. And government can control its abuse so that children are not harmed but empowered to understand the necessary hierarchy of control that God creates on earth.
Unless God's Law is restored to its rightful place of authority on earth, evil will become insufferable. The War Against Women and the War on Terror are simply leadups to the final conflagration that will take this world to a place where history will have no precedent except the Biblical Flood.
It is exactly this coming evil and the fact that women allow, or even support, such evil that puts women directly in the cross hairs of men being driven to demonstrate the dominance they were born with as a part of the Law of the Jungle.
Men like Ted Turner and the other powerful men who comprise the global cabal know this full well. When they incite and seduce women into taking the lead in their "women's rights movement" they know full well the blood and carnage that will result. But they are willing to see this carnage because at the end of World War III is the global government the men of power believe they have been created to establish...the global government prophesied in 2 Thess 2.
The Law of God is the only hope but the secular global elites, the new nobility, use the women to make it impossible to establish the Law of God because the women and their demands for "women's right" to murder their own babies and fornicate with whomever they choose makes the establishment of God's Law impossible for God's Law forbids both those demands of women. The global elitists know that by seducing women to clamor ever more vigorously and violently for those "women's rights" that they make a global war inevitable because men of God will not surrender God's Law without first being destroyed themselves, exactly as was done to Jesus Christ and His Apostles. What the global elites don't understand is that men of God will no longer go impotently to their deaths but will fight to the death, and, if the global elites persist in using the War Against Women as a ploy to create their global government, the Lord Jesus Christ will return to Head the Army that will finally conquer the earth with the Law of God.
Protestant orgasm addicts joined by a Catholic Christianity that adopted the same orgasm addicted Christian have become traitors to the Kingdom of God. By abandoning the Eunuch for the Kingdom of God strategy modeled by the Lord Jesus Christ, the Apostles, and especially the Apostle Paul, hardly any men of God were left who could resist the awesome pussy power of the women, which as those in the Kingdom of God know, is the most powerful force on earth, so powerful it is capable of leading Adam and the whole world into the clutches of death.
To awaken us to the dire straits, God has turned the whole world over to its sins. The Law of the Jungle grows more powerful each day with the predator spirit that is the spirit of murder itself erupting into outbursts of rebellion and revolt that the leaders of the Law of the Jungle intend to use to knit the whole world together into a War that will catapult them to one world rule, the global hegemony written about in 2 Thess. 2.
It is for this reason that God is raising up His Army to make the global nobility understand that even if this present iteration of the Army of God is defeated, the coming of the Lord Jesus Christ will be the result of that defeat and the temporary victory foretold in 2 Thess. 2 will result in the Kingdom of God being established on earth with the Lord Jesus Christ as the King of kings and the Lord of Lords.
God has sentenced the United States of America to the War Against Women because women have presumed to usurp God's right to be the One who decides who lives and who dies in this nation. The only way for this war to stop is women must repent of this usurpation of God's authority.
THE MODERN MEDEA: Abortion is the state-sanctioned murder of choice for the Modern Medea.
The story of the woman who murders her own children to exact revenge from the children's father who rejected her is very old. The old story survived to this day because the rage that fed the mother's decision to murder her own children is an old rage that visits this world every time a woman who has placed herself in a position to bear a man's child is rejected by that man.
The Modern Medea tells us loud and clear that hardly any woman would murder her own child if the man who begat that child would accept responsibly for being the child's father. But the Modern Medea also tells us, conversely, that rejection by that man might inevitably lead to the child's murder.
It is in light of this fact that we see how men--both those men whose sperm was used to conceive the child and those men who, while never penis-touching the woman, still tolerated a social milieu that accepted men who refused their duty to raise the children they bred--are literally culpable if not directly responsible for the murder of every child who is aborted.
It is in the example of the Modern Medea--both in the sexual seduction inception and the murderous outcome--that we can see man convincing the woman that men are working to accomplish the woman's benefit while men--men like Ted Turner, and myself before I repented--are actually bringing murderous war as the outcome.
Such is the reality of the present War Against Women (WAW).
It is this fact about our mutual guilt in creating a sexually licentious society that has not only been hidden but is continuing to prevent me as a journalist from telling the truth about the society I live in. In other words, the dirty secret that this society is determined to keep from being discussed is this: we the people of the USA have taken the lead in creating a sexual revolution in the world. This sexual revolution is far along its path toward complete victory. And the people of the United States of America, whether they call themselves Christian, pagan or agnostic, are participating in this revolution as fellow travelers into the Brave New Age, into the New World Order, into the new global government based on the Law of the Jungle.
WOMEN IN AUTHORITY
Matters of authority and sovereignty are at stake in the War Against Women. Marriage is the paradigm that God intends to use to teach the world about His Authority.
Great confusion has been created among people because of the pervasive power the theory of evolution has created in the minds of people. Women must realize that they, as always, will either help eliminate the confusion or will make the War Against Women grow ever faster toward maximum velocity.
It is in the marriage role that women can do the most to eliminate the confusion.
The woman in a marriage who attempts to order a man to obey her will provokes a man who has been raised to think he is a naked ape exactly the way a female lion provokes a male lion. Instead of thinking about what the woman is attempting to accomplish through her order, the male only sees that the female is attempting to establish dominance. Such a challenge to a male will often provoke a confrontation, often a deadly confrontation, as the incidents in the War Against Women prove each day that passes.
But the most salient fact is this: a women in a marriage who uses her power to establish dominance over a male who knows he is a creature created in the image of God also provokes a man of God.
Women who decide they don't care who they provoke to anger, to war, are being seduced by Satan exactly as Eve was seduced. A clash results not only with a man of God but with God Himself.
Whereas with the first Adam, there was no power to resist the awesome pussy power of the woman. With the Last Adam such power came to earth, and is revealed in war on earth.
Insight into this inevitable clash goes a long way toward understanding why the Apostle Paul said in 1Ti 2:12 , "But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence."
To avoid the provocation in the flesh, as well as to establish the primacy of the Lord Jesus Christ as the Husband of the Church, His Bride, were these words spoken. Women would be wise to heed them if they want to begin to reverse the velocity of the War Against Women (WAW).
Otherwise, it's balls to the wall.